Competition

Wine Style Asia

1 award on 1 wine in our catalogue, 2010.

Wines
1
Awards in the catalogue
1

Weight class

Why there is no class yet.

The class is a judgement about the competition, not about the wines. It rests on four public grounds, and what we relied on is printed here in plain text.

Known to us only from a producer's list of awards (Singapore, 2010). We could not find the organiser, the rules or the results, so no weight is assigned.

This is not yet enough to assign a class.

What decides a class

  • Blind tasting

    Is the tasting blind, and are the rules published?

  • Share of medals

    What share of entries leaves with a medal?

  • The jury

    How is the jury composed, and how independent is it of the entrants?

  • Cost of entry

    What does entry cost, and is marketing sold alongside the medal?

Where we cannot establish these, the class stays unassigned — a guessed grade is worse than an honest gap.

Wine Style Asia

Held in
no data
Awards in the catalogue
1
Wines
1
Award years
2010

of them claimed by a producer or shop: 1

Medalists

Every award from this competition in our catalogue.

Grouped by the year the award was given, newest first. A medal belongs to a batch rather than to a wine in general, so the vintage of the awarded batch is printed on the row.

Bronze11 wine · 1 year

2010

1 award

A row marked claimed is known from the producer or a shop rather than from the competition's own results. Medals are weighted by how trustworthy the competition is — they are never summed as equals, and a wine without awards is not worse than one with a pay-to-play medal. How we weigh awards.

Sources and other competitions

Where these results come from.

  • Producer's website

    1 award

    Medals the producer lists for its own wines, with the year and the vintage as stated. Marked claimed on the row.

A medal recorded wrongly, or a class you think is unfair? Producers and readers can send a correction, and a person reads every message.